Washington—Governors and state legislators routinely praise small businesses for their contributions to economic growth and job creation, but states actually give big businesses the dominant share of their economic development incentive awards. A new analysis of more than 4,200 economic development incentive awards in 14 states, including North Carolina, finds that large companies receive dominant shares: 70 percent of the deals and 90 percent of the dollars.
The deals, worth more than $3.2 billion, were granted by programs that are facially accessible to both small and large companies.
That is the key finding of Shortchanging Small Business, a study released today by Good Jobs First, at: www.goodjobsfirst.org/shortchanging . It was funded by the Surdna Foundation and the Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation. All findings and policy conclusions are solely those of Good Jobs First.
Profoundly biased against small, local and entrepreneurial businesses
“State economic development spending is profoundly biased against small, local and entrepreneurial businesses,” said Greg LeRoy, executive director of Good Jobs First and lead author of the study. “Our findings definitively confirm what many small businesspeople have long believed.”
The 14 states where the awards were analyzed are Florida, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Missouri, North Carolina, New Mexico, Nevada, New York, Pennsylvania, Vermont, Virginia and Wisconsin.
Its analysis of the One North Carolina fund from 2008-2013 shows that 93 percent of the $26.3 million allocated in that period went to large recipients. Here at WRAL TechWire, we have heard startup entrepreneurs comment on the state’s bias toward entrenched interests and larger firms on a regular basis.
The slight variation in the degree of big-business dominance among the states (80 to 96 percent of the dollars) is meaningless, since the programs and states vary. The key finding is how consistently the programs grossly favor big businesses.
The study, based on a close examination of the recipient companies, designates businesses as large or small based on their employment size as well as their total number of establishments and whether they are locally or independently owned.
“As a policy solution, we do not recommend simply reallocating deals and dollars,” said LeRoy. “These tax-break deals often mean little to small businesses. Instead, states should reform their incentive rules by tightening eligibility to exclude large recipients. The resulting savings could better fund public goods that benefit all employers and help small businesses with the persistent credit crunch.”
Short of excluding big businesses, the report recommends states spend much less on large companies by using safeguards such as dollar caps per deal, dollar caps per job, and dollar caps per company.
The full report includes state by state breakdowns and a complete description of methodology: http://www.goodjobsfirst.org/sites/default/files/docs/pdf/shortchanging.pdf
