Updated Mar. 7, 2013 at 8:13 a.m.
Research Triangle Park, N.C. — Big Blue employees angry about changes in their 401K plans have picked up support from two heavyweight allies in seeking the reversal of those moves: Two U.S. Senators. Copyright 2013 WRAL Tech Wire. All rights reserved.
Two senators blast IBM for changes in employee 401(K) plans
4 comments | Post Yours
Print this blog postE-mail blog post
Share
Research Triangle Park, N.C. — Big Blue employees angry about changes in their 401K plans have picked up support from two heavyweight allies in seeking the reversal of those moves: Two U.S. Senators. Copyright 2013 WRAL Tech Wire. All rights reserved.
The Skinny
WRAL Local Tech Wire Publisher and Editor Rick Smith dishes out tidbits from the local technology sector. Read more articles…
| page 1 |
IBM'ers are cry babies, always looking for ways to abuse the system. No sympathy offered, now get back to work!
What many people don't seem to realize (or maybe just admit) is that this is just one step in IBM getting more aggressive at cutting the US workforce.
For employees that do stay, there is not much of a cost difference. The savings comes into effect when employees leave (either voluntarily or involuntarily). Since the match has not been paid, it reduces the costs to let someone go.
And, with creative accounting, you could probably even negate the costs of terminating someone since the 401k match is cash that is now back in IBM's pockets. In other words, IBM budgets for the 401k match on a per-pay-period basis, but then realizes that as savings against severance costs. Thus making it easier to do lay offs (oh, I'm sorry, Resource Actions)as it doesn't affect quarterly results as much. Note, I don't know accounting laws, so don't know if this is even a legal approach.
For employees that do stay, there is not much of a cost difference. The savings comes into effect when employees leave (either voluntarily or involuntarily). Since the match has not been paid, it reduces the costs to let someone go.
And, with creative accounting, you could probably even negate the costs of terminating someone since the 401k match is cash that is now back in IBM's pockets. In other words, IBM budgets for the 401k match on a per-pay-period basis, but then realizes that as savings against severance costs. Thus making it easier to do lay offs (oh, I'm sorry, Resource Actions)as it doesn't affect quarterly results as much. Note, I don't know accounting laws, so don't know if this is even a legal approach.
Well, look at it like this. IBM announced Tuesday that they are moving two plants to Mexico, laying off around 800 people. Those folks, since they did not stay for the entire year, won't get IBM Contributions into their retirement accounts.
So yes, IBM is definitely using questionable tactics on American workers.
So yes, IBM is definitely using questionable tactics on American workers.
| page 1 |
Please Log In to add a comment.
Best of TechWire Insider
The Skinny
NC Biotech Center braces for worst as Senate slashes budget, too
ArchiveSocial, a new Durham success story, brings home international award
Durham's high-tech infrastructure, talent lure Virginia company
Lenovo acknowledges layoffs in Morrisville as part of shift to 'PC Plus' strategy
Raleigh-based PRA International eyes public offering
Will lightning strike again for veteran entrepreneur Brian Handly at StepLeader?
Raleigh app developer StepLeader lands $4.4M in first fund raiser
IBM opens Linux center in China, says it will work with Red Hat
Red-hot Raleigh startup WedPics hauls in $1.1M in funding
New Triangle venture capital firm slowly emerging from shadows














