Updated Oct. 1, 2012 at 6:35 a.m.
The three gubernatorial candidates on the ballot this November weigh in with their views about broadband Internet access across North Carolina ranging from economic development and health care to education and general policy....
NC governor candidates agree: Broadband is vital
2 comments | Post Yours
Print this blog postE-mail blog post
Share
The three gubernatorial candidates on the ballot this November weigh in with their views about broadband Internet access across North Carolina ranging from economic development and health care to education and general policy....
WRAL Tech Wire any time: Twitter, Facebook
Copyright 2013 WRAL Tech Wire. All rights reserved.Please log in or register to view WRALTechWire Insider content
To access this premium content and other benefits, become a WRAL TechWire Insider. Daily, monthly, and annual memberships available.
| page 1 |
For the record, It has been requested by both the phone company which I pay for two lines every month and the nonexistent cable company that I not inquire about broadband service again.
How many times do we have to hear this song and dance about broadband? Every election cycle we hear it over and over.
The simple fact is this. There are some of us who will never have broadband access because of the term "DENSITY". It costs a lot of money to lay fiber line in a ditch for miles only to service a few. That simply isn't going to happen unless A) cable companies are forced to or B) Cable companies are subsidized to do it.
As far as the phone lines. The phone companies are required by law to provide me access to a phone line if I have the money to pay for the service. If I build a house 10 miles out in the Neuse river mashes they have to provide service. Now the kicker. That requirement (law) does not include data. Only voice communications. The phone companies are not obligated to extend data services. So, A) they be required by law to extend data or, B) the tax payer subsidizes the extension.
So keep talking the broadband nonsense.
As far as the phone lines. The phone companies are required by law to provide me access to a phone line if I have the money to pay for the service. If I build a house 10 miles out in the Neuse river mashes they have to provide service. Now the kicker. That requirement (law) does not include data. Only voice communications. The phone companies are not obligated to extend data services. So, A) they be required by law to extend data or, B) the tax payer subsidizes the extension.
So keep talking the broadband nonsense.
| page 1 |
Please Log In to add a comment.
Best of TechWire Insider
The Skinny
Linux market still remains 'bread-and-butter' business at Red Hat
Duke's Vivek Wadhwa cracks Time 'Most Influential' list
IBM layoff update: North American cuts climb; mum is word down under
At last! Sprint 4G service formally launches in Triangle
Big Blue's layoff total climbs in RTP; North America total surges past 2,800
Big Blue layoff count nears 2,800 in North America alone
NC's high-tech job picture improves in May, but ...
IBM layoff count hits nearly 2,300 across 31 work groups
NC IDEA: Startup deal flow 'better than it has ever been'
IBM's job cuts are global, nearing 4,000; most are in U.S.













